Supreme Court Allows Pappu Yadav To Move High Court For Urgent Hearing On Security Plea

Date:

 Bihar MP Rajesh Ranjan alias Pappu Yadav told the Supreme Court that his plea seeking protection over alleged Lawrence Bishnoi gang threats has not been listed before the High Court since November 19, 2024.

Supreme Court Grants Limited Relief To Bihar MP

The Supreme Court on Monday granted limited relief to sitting Bihar MP Rajesh Ranjan alias Pappu Yadav.

The Court allowed him to approach the High Court for urgent listing of his pending petition. The petition concerns alleged death threats from the gang of jailed gangster Lawrence Bishnoi.

A Bench of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi heard the matter.

The Bench noted Yadav’s grievance that the High Court had not listed his protection plea since November 19, 2024.

The case is titled Rajesh Ranjan Pappu Yadav v. Union of India, W.P.(Crl.) No. 164/2026.

Petitioner Cites Delay Before High Court

Senior Advocate Shadan Farasat appeared for Yadav.

He submitted that Yadav had repeatedly mentioned the matter before the High Court. However, the High Court had not taken up the petition.

Farasat said Yadav currently has only “Y category” security with two personnel.

He also referred to an alleged attempt on the life of Yadav’s brother.

However, Farasat clarified that Yadav was not asking the Supreme Court to examine the merits. He said the immediate request was only for an early hearing before the High Court.

Bench Notes Existing Security Arrangements

During the hearing, Justice Joymalya Bagchi noted that the State appeared to have provided some security to Yadav.

He also remarked that Yadav had private guards.

However, Farasat clarified, on instructions, that Yadav did not have any private security.

He reiterated that threats from the Bishnoi gang had allegedly been issued openly.

Farasat also submitted that the High Court’s notice order had not been uploaded. As a result, Yadav could not file a Special Leave Petition.

Supreme Court Declines To Examine Merits

The Chief Justice observed that thousands of matters remain pending before High Courts.

Therefore, the Supreme Court showed reluctance to directly entertain such petitions.

At the same time, the Bench noted Yadav’s specific grievance. His petition had not been listed for several months.

For that limited reason, the Court agreed to grant liberty to him.

Liberty Granted To Move Formal Application

The Supreme Court recorded that it does not ordinarily entertain petitions of this nature.

However, it considered Yadav’s claim that the High Court had not listed his matter since November 19, 2024.

The Bench therefore allowed him to file a formal application before the High Court.

High Court To Consider Listing Request

The Supreme Court clarified that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

The Bench also expressed confidence that the High Court would consider Yadav’s request and pass appropriate orders.

spot_img

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

Supreme Court Acquits Former Clerk in Bribery Case

The Supreme Court has stressed that Bribery Demand Proof...

Supreme Court Examines Shiv Sena Symbol Dispute

The Supreme Court has raised a key question in...

Supreme Court Upholds Excess Pay Recovery From NIT Calicut Teachers

The Supreme Court has upheld the Recovery of Excess...

Higher Marks Cannot Cure Lack of Essential Qualification: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that an Essential Recruitment...