Subtitle:
The suo motu PIL was registered pursuant to Supreme Court directions in Sunny Chauhan v. State of Haryana and concerns FSL infrastructure, timely forensic reports and digital sharing of criminal case status reports.
High Court Takes Up FSL Infrastructure Issue
The Meghalaya High Court has initiated steps to strengthen forensic infrastructure by asking newly added respondents to examine the feasibility of establishing an independent Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) in the state. The move comes through a suo motu public interest litigation and highlights the growing focus on Meghalaya independent FSL as a key requirement for improving criminal justice administration.
Suo Motu PIL Based On Supreme Court Directions
A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Revati Mohite Dere and Justice W. Diengdoh registered PIL No. 12 of 2026 following directions issued by the Supreme Court in its order dated 11 May 2026 in Sunny Chauhan v. State of Haryana.
Two Issues Before The Court
The High Court identified two major issues that require immediate attention. First, it will examine the adequacy of Forensic Science Laboratory infrastructure and the timely submission of FSL reports in criminal cases across Meghalaya. Second, it will review the existing system for uploading and sharing status reports in criminal cases. Additionally, the Court will consider whether a digital police portal can ensure that status reports reach courts before scheduled hearings.
New Respondents Added
To facilitate a comprehensive review, the Court directed the Registry to implead the Directorate of Central Forensic Science Services, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi, as respondent no. 3. It also added the Directorate of Forensic Science Laboratory, Meghalaya, as respondent no. 4.
State Given Time To Respond
Additional Advocate General Mr. N.D. Chullai, assisted by Government Advocate Ms. R. Colney, requested time to file an affidavit in reply. Accordingly, the Court granted the State three weeks to submit its response before the Registry.
Feasibility Of An Independent FSL
Meanwhile, the Court asked both newly added respondents to assess the feasibility of setting up a Meghalaya independent FSL. The assessment could play a crucial role in addressing delays in forensic reports, which often affect the progress of criminal trials.
Amicus Curiae Appointed
The Bench appointed Mr. K. Ch. Gautam as Amicus Curiae to assist in the suo motu PIL. It also directed the Registry to provide him with a copy of the petition so he can effectively assist the Court during the next hearing.
Next Date Of Hearing
The Court has scheduled the matter for further consideration on 27 July 2026.
