Guwahati Civil Court Grants Ad-Interim Injunction in ₹500 Crore Defamation Suit Filed by Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma

Date:

A Civil Court in Guwahati has granted an ad-interim injunction in a ₹500 crore defamation suit filed by Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma. The Court restrained senior Congress leaders Gaurav Gogoi, Bhupesh Baghel, and Jitendra Singh from making or circulating any allegedly defamatory statements against him.

Civil Judge (Senior Division) No. 1 Nayanjyoti Sarma passed the order on 12 February 2026.

Interim Relief Granted

After hearing submissions on behalf of the plaintiff, the Court directed the three Congress leaders, along with a prominent Assamese daily named as a defendant, not to publish, circulate, or disseminate any further allegedly defamatory material concerning the Chief Minister.

The restraint will operate until the defendants appear personally before the Court.

The Court listed the matter for 9 March 2026 for the appearance of the defendants.

While granting interim relief, the Court observed that refusal of an injunction at this stage could “defeat the justice.” It further noted that continued circulation of the alleged statements could lead to multiplicity of proceedings.

Background of the ₹500 Crore Suit

Chief Minister Sarma instituted the civil defamation suit seeking damages of ₹500 crore. The action arises from statements allegedly made by the Congress leaders during a press conference in February and in related political engagements.

According to the plaint, the defendants made allegations concerning the Chief Minister’s conduct and assets. These included claims relating to alleged illegal land ownership and other purported improprieties.

The plaintiff has asserted that these allegations are false, malicious, and damaging to his reputation.

Counsel for Chief Minister Sarma challenged the accuracy of the allegations before the Court. He also sought documentary proof in support of the statements attributed to the defendants.

The suit will now proceed in accordance with the schedule fixed by the Civil Court.

spot_img

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

‘Arbitration Cannot Be Arbitrary’: Supreme Court Sets Aside Tribunal Appointment for Lack of Consent

The Supreme Court has set aside the initiation of...

Police Officer Who Fails to Furnish Written Grounds of Arrest Must Face Departmental Inquiry: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on September 21 held that authorities...

Supreme Court Requires Magistrate’s Approval for Re-Arrest After Arrest Is Quashed Over Article 22(1) Breach

The Supreme Court on Monday laid down fresh safeguards...