Delhi HC: Live-In Couple Entitled To Police Protection From Parental Threats

Date:

The Delhi High Court has held that two consenting adults in a live-in relationship are entitled to police protection against threats or interference from family members. The Court reiterated that the constitutional right to choose a partner flows from Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

Justice Saurabh Banerjee allowed a petition filed by a couple who sought protection from the woman’s father. The petitioners alleged that he was threatening them because of their live-in relationship.

Court Observations

The Court observed that although a live-in relationship is not legally the same as marriage, it is “akin to marriage.” Marriage in India is recognised between two consenting individuals, regardless of caste, creed, colour, religion, or faith.

The Court further noted that Article 19 guarantees the right to freedom, while Article 21 protects the right to life and personal liberty. These constitutional rights also protect the freedom of adults to choose their partners.

Petitioners’ Submissions

Counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that the couple, born in 2006 and 2007, are consenting adults. They have been in a relationship since 2024 and are currently living together.

The petitioners also executed a Live-in Relationship Agreement on February 17, 2026. According to the petition, the woman’s father strongly opposed the relationship and had been issuing threats, putting their life and liberty at risk.

Court Grants Protection

Justice Banerjee held that both petitioners are major and consenting adults. Therefore, they are free to choose and live with partners of their choice without interference.

The Court recorded that the couple voluntarily executed the live-in relationship agreement on 17.02.2026 to formally acknowledge their relationship.

The Court emphasised that no person—including parents, relatives, or friends—has the authority to threaten or interfere with such a relationship.

Directions Issued By The Court

The High Court directed that the petitioners may approach the concerned SHO or Beat Constable if they face threats. The police authorities must provide necessary assistance in accordance with law.

The Court also clarified that if the couple shifts to another jurisdiction, they must inform the concerned SHO within three days. Police protection will continue after such intimation.

Case Details

Case Title: Kartik & Anr v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

spot_img

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

Supreme Court Acquits Former Clerk in Bribery Case

The Supreme Court has stressed that Bribery Demand Proof...

Supreme Court Examines Shiv Sena Symbol Dispute

The Supreme Court has raised a key question in...

Supreme Court Upholds Excess Pay Recovery From NIT Calicut Teachers

The Supreme Court has upheld the Recovery of Excess...

Higher Marks Cannot Cure Lack of Essential Qualification: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that an Essential Recruitment...