Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Supplier
On November 27, 2025, the Delhi High Court issued an ex parte ad interim injunction prohibiting Greenland Trading Company — a Delhi-based seller of Ayurvedic/wellness products — from manufacturing, selling, or advertising any goods under the name “HIMALAYA” or any mark deceptively similar to it. The order remains effective until March 12, 2026, unless modified by further orders.
Why the Court Intervened: Risk of Confusion & Brand Dilution
The court noted that Greenland Trading’s branding was strikingly similar to that of Himalaya Wellness Company — including use of the same mark, similar trade dress, and overlapping lines of products.
Given that both parties dealt in the same category (Ayurvedic and wellness products) and marketed via similar channels, the court concluded that ordinary consumers might be misled into believing that the supplier’s products originated from or were endorsed by Himalaya Wellness.
Allowing such use could dilute the distinctiveness of Himalaya’s brand and irreparably harm its goodwill, particularly in the health and wellness sector where consumer trust is paramount.
Himalaya’s Prior Use and Reputation — Key to the Court’s Decision
The plaintiff (Himalaya Wellness) submitted that it has used the “HIMALAYA” brand globally across Ayurvedic, pharmaceutical, and personal-care products for decades, and enjoys strong consumer goodwill backed by trademark and copyright registrations.
The court accepted this as establishing prior adoption and longstanding usage, which gave Himalaya a legitimate proprietary interest in the mark and associated branding identity.
Legal Implications: Upholding Trademark Rights & Consumer Protection
By granting the injunction, the Delhi High Court reaffirmed critical legal principles under Indian trademark law: prior use and goodwill grant legitimate proprietary rights; unauthorised adoption of identical or deceptively similar marks constitutes infringement and unfair competition; and courts can act swiftly, especially in sensitive domains like health and wellness.
This ruling highlights how courts balance commercial interests with consumer protection: preventing deceptive trade practices, preserving brand identity, and safeguarding trust in the marketplace.
Case Title: Himalaya Wellness Company & Ors. v. Greenland Trading Company
